Sunday March 15, 2026

It was a big week for the DDC Research Lab...

We spoke at a PRSA conference in Atlanta. We spoke at AMEC AI Day. We held a DDC Masterclass in New York. We hosted a DDC spy game at Spyscape AI event. And we attended our first PR Week Awards Gala.

Somewhere in the middle of all of that, our Run Club happened — and even though I wasn't in the room, Samantha ran an exceptional session with Maura McGill that I think every data-driven communicator needs to hear.

I've pulled one lesson from Run Club and one moment from the New York DDC Masterclass. Both point at the same problem.

Before you deploy a message or campaign, how often do you test it with your audience first?

Login or Subscribe to participate

THE LESSON 🏃🏻‍♂️

Maura McGill made a distinction this week that I keep thinking about.

Social listening tells you what people said. Narrative intelligence tells you what it means, where it's heading, and who's driving it.

She put it this way: finding out about a narrative shift from a reporter calling you is like stepping outside and getting rained on. Narrative intelligence is the weather radar — you see the storm forming before it hits.

Most of us are outside getting wet.

The difference isn't tools. It's intent. Are you monitoring to report, or monitoring to decide? Coverage is a mechanism, not a metric. Opinion movement is the outcome.

Here's what that looks like when it works:

Maura ran a campaign for DoorDash in New York with a goal of moving favorability by 3 points. They moved it by 7. Among persuadable policy audiences, they moved it by 17–18 points — five to six times their goal. And because every decision was anchored to a business outcome before a dollar was spent, the results spoke for themselves.

That's the difference between monitoring and intelligence.

THE MOMENT 💊

In this week's New York workshop, one of the attendees told a story about a social media strategy deck she'd been working on for nearly an entire quarter. Constant feedback. Revision after revision. Lost sleep. Work handed off to teammates. She was burned out.

Then, almost as an afterthought, she said: "It doesn't even have a major business impact."

The room went quiet.

That's the trap. We pour ourselves into the work. We iterate until it's perfect. And somewhere along the way, we forget to ask whether it's pointed at anything that actually matters.

The fix isn't working harder. It's identifying your star player — the internal leader whose success depends on the outcome you're trying to drive — and designing your work around what they need, before they ask for it.

That's Chapter 1 of the DDC Playbook. Read it here →

And if you want to put it into practice with a guided session, worksheet, and a badge you can earn for your LinkedIn profile, the January Run Club activation with Evan is the place to start. Access it here →

THE OPPORTUNITY 🏃🏻‍♂️

In May, I'm bringing everything we've been building to Meltwater Summit in New York (May 5–6). I'm designing a dedicated DDC experience for communicators who want to stop being order takers and start earning a seat at the table.

If you want to be on the DDC list and be added to a special DDC experience at Summit, hit reply and say “SUMMIT” and I will add you to the list

Starting next week, I'm also kicking off a four-part series in this newsletter — one edition for each point of the compass. This week was the warmup.

— Dino

(I’m off to plan my son’s birthday outing to Magic Mountain…. I can’t say I love rollercoasters, but I will try tomorrow!)

Use code [MSDDCRL] for $100 off your ticket

Want to go deeper?

Know someone who needs to hear this? Forward this email. The best thing you can do for a colleague stuck in the measurement trap is show them there's a way out.

What outcome are you struggling to connect to? Reply to this email. I read everything.

🏃 Run Club

Free weekly virtual workshop. New expert every Thursday.

🎯 Private Workshop

Bring DDC to your team. Teach the frameworks the top 8% use.

Keep Reading